Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Johnson v. Vee-Jay Cement Contracting Co.

Johnson v. Vee-Jay Cement Contracting Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 9, 2003 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
128 S.W.3d 528; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1909; 2003 WL 22888361 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Johnson v. Vee-Jay Cement Contracting Co.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlyn and Carol Johnson appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining Vee-Jay Cement’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the Johnsons’ petition with prejudice. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err by sustaining Vee-Jay’s motion for summary judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.