Weil v. State
Weil v. State
129 S.W.3d 383; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1786; 2003 WL 22658105
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Weil v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Arthur Weil appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. He seeks to vacate his conviction for first degree robbery and twenty-five year prison sentence based on the alleged ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no error in the denial of postconviction relief. Because a published opinion would have no prejudicial value, the parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reason for our decision.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.