Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Glaub v. Central Garden & Pet Co.

Glaub v. Central Garden & Pet Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 29, 2003 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
138 S.W.3d 739; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1185; 2003 WL 21738866 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Glaub v. Central Garden & Pet Co.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Thomas Glaub and Cynthia Glaub, appeal from the judgment dismissing their action that alleged Thomas Glaub suffered injuries when he used a flea treatment. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information *740only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.