Shy v. State
Shy v. State
157 S.W.3d 231; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1821; 2004 WL 2709494
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Shy v. State
Opinion
ORDER
William Shy appeals the judgment denying his motion under Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. 1
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
1
. Shy’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute was affirmed in State v. Shy, 52 S.W.3d 585 (Mo.App. E.D. 2001).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.