Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

State v. Spencer

State v. Spencer
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 11, 2004 · Crane, Glenn, Hoff, Kathianne, Knaup, Mary, Norton
139 S.W.3d 604; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 692; 2004 WL 1049057 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Spencer

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Spencer appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate its order denying his request, filed pursuant to Section 550.040 RSMo 1994, for the taxing of costs in his favor. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.