Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Hemp v. State

Hemp v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 27, 2004 · Crane, Hoff, Norton
126 S.W.3d 776; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 101; 2004 WL 117077 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Hemp v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Cabot T. Hemp, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.

However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.