Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Provance v. Sauer

Provance v. Sauer
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 10, 2004 · Cohen, Crahan, Shaw
127 S.W.3d 705; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 691; 2004 WL 291220 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Provance v. Sauer

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dorothy Joan Sauer n/k/a Dorothy Joan Provance (“Wife”) appeals from a Family Court Modification and Judgment entered by the Circuit' Court of St. Louis County. *706Wife contends that the motion court erred in: (1) reducing the amount of Husband’s maintenance obligation; (2) failing to increase Husband’s maintenance obligation; and (3) awarding an insufficient amount of attorney’s fees to Wife.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgement is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Redlinger v. Redlinger, 111 S.W.3d 413, 415 (Mo.App. E.D. 2003). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.