Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Keegan v. State

Keegan v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 2, 2004 · Hardwick, Newton, Spinden
127 S.W.3d 715; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 291; 2004 WL 414104 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Keegan v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Keegan appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, alleging ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.