Hemp v. State
Hemp v. State
129 S.W.3d 404; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 325; 2004 WL 420156
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Hemp v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Cabot Hemp appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.085(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.