Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 9, 2004 · Crane, Hoff, Norton
129 S.W.3d 426; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 315; 2004 WL 421118 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Thomas v. State

Opinion of the Court

*427 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Johnnie Thomas, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.