State v. Holman
State v. Holman
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Ronald Holman (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of: two counts of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise noted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.