May v. Union Pacific Railroad
May v. Union Pacific Railroad
131 S.W.3d 369; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 48
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
May v. Union Pacific Railroad
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Plaintiff, Wanda G. May, appeals from that part of a judgment granting summary judgment on Count III of her petition. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.