Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Harris v. State

Harris v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 6, 2004 · Gaertner, III, Sullivan
131 S.W.3d 853; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 500; 2004 WL 737355 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Harris v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Harris (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends he entered his guilty plea to first-degree robbery unknowingly because his counsel failed to inform him that he would be required to serve 85 percent of the prison term before becoming eligible for parole.

*854Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2003, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.