Temme v. State
Temme v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant, Michael Temme (“Movant”), appeals from the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
. Rule 24.035 applies only to convictions for felonies, so this appeal applies only to Mov-ant's conviction for attempted first-degree burglary.
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.