Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Christopher v. Hankins

Christopher v. Hankins
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 27, 2004 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
133 S.W.3d 540; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 605; 2004 WL 885226 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Christopher v. Hankins

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Falecia Christopher appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for new trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.