Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Wisnesky v. RPR Correspondent Clearing

Wisnesky v. RPR Correspondent Clearing
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 30, 2004 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
135 S.W.3d 474; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 450; 2004 WL 612935 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Wisnesky v. RPR Correspondent Clearing

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Jeana Wisnesky, appeals from the decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her workers’ compensation benefits. The decision *475is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑