Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Horton v. State

Horton v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 15, 2004 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
136 S.W.3d 829; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1122; 2004 WL 1325698 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Horton v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Demond A. Horton (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits without evidentiary hearing. In his motion, movant claims that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.