Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Buster v. City of Herculaneum

Buster v. City of Herculaneum
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 22, 2004 · Crane, Hoff, Norton
136 S.W.3d 848; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 909; 2004 WL 1381135 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Buster v. City of Herculaneum

Opinion of the Court

*849ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Flavy Buster, d/b/a the Artesian Lounge, appeals from the trial court’s order and judgment granting the City of Herculaneum’s Motion to Dismiss and dismissing all counts of Buster’s petition with prejudice. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.