Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

State ex rel. Barnett v. Doe

State ex rel. Barnett v. Doe
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 7, 2004 · Gaertner, Shaw, Sullivan
143 S.W.3d 655; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272; 2004 WL 1964917 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State ex rel. Barnett v. Doe

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Barnett appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his criminal complaint because it was not signed by the Prosecuting Attorney or Attorney General.

We have reviewed Barnett’s brief and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No errors of law appear. An extended opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.