Gillespie v. State
Gillespie v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Christopher Gillespie (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.