Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Schmitz v. Prince

Schmitz v. Prince
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 28, 2004 · Ahrens, Crandall, Crane
144 S.W.3d 893; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1402; 2004 WL 2158902 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Schmitz v. Prince

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Dirk Schmitz, appeals from the judgment, in a court-tried case, in favor of defendants, James Michael Prince and Mid-States Aviation, Inc., in his action for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and fraud against Prince and of negligence against Prince and Mid-States.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.