Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Moore v. State

Moore v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 17, 2004 · Ahrens, Crandall, Russell
145 S.W.3d 849; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1164; 2004 WL 1824114 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Moore v. State

Opinion of the Court

*850ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kevin Moore, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was previously convicted, after a jury trial, of kidnapping, four counts of forcible sodomy, forcible rape and attempted forcible rape.

The judgment of the trial court in the Rule 29.15 proceeding is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.