Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004

Painter v. State

Painter v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 26, 2004 · Ellis, Hardwick, Smart
147 S.W.3d 114; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1541; 2004 WL 2381104 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Painter v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Painter appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion after an evidentiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a published opinion, but we have *115provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.