Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

James v. State

James v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 16, 2005 · Hardwick, Breckenridge, Spinden
169 S.W.3d 557; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203; 2005 WL 1949506 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

James v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney James appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evi-dentiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s determination that James failed to prove his ineffective assistance of counsel claim by a preponderance of the evidence. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.