James v. State
James v. State
169 S.W.3d 557; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203; 2005 WL 1949506
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
James v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Rodney James appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evi-dentiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s determination that James failed to prove his ineffective assistance of counsel claim by a preponderance of the evidence. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.