Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

James v. State

James v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 16, 2005 · Hardwick, Breckenridge, Spinden
169 S.W.3d 557; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203; 2005 WL 1949506 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
James v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney James appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evi-dentiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s determination that James failed to prove his ineffective assistance of counsel claim by a preponderance of the evidence. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.