Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Stephens v. State

Stephens v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 23, 2005 · Smart, Holliger, Hardwick
169 S.W.3d 580; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1231; 2005 WL 2007882 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Stephens v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Stephens appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.