Taylor v. State
Taylor v. State
169 S.W.3d 897; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1283; 2005 WL 2088364
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Taylor v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Chadrick Taylor, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the sentencing hearing.
The trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.