Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Hunter v. State

Hunter v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 30, 2005 · Crane, Mooney, Shaw
169 S.W.3d 890; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1269; 2005 WL 2076888 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Hunter v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Michael Hunter, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance for failing to negotiate a plea agreement for a more favorable sentence than he received.

*891 The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.