Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Bolden v. State

Bolden v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 15, 2005 · Ulrich, Smart, Ellis
157 S.W.3d 410; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 397; 2005 WL 589297 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Bolden v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnie Bolden appeals the denial of his Rule- 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.