Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel
Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel
157 S.W.3d 762; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 375; 2005 WL 589613
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Kersting Ex Rel. Kersting v. Hertsel
Opinion
ORDER
Catherine Magallanes appeals from the judgment modifying a prior judgment of paternity and consent order. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.