Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

DITTMAIER v. Hemphill

DITTMAIER v. Hemphill
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 13, 2005 · Hoff, Ahrens, Cohen
178 S.W.3d 593; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324; 2005 WL 2208586 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

DITTMAIER v. Hemphill

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Dittmaier (Dittmaier) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, entered in accordance with a jury verdict in favor of Earlene Hemphill (Hemphill) on Dittmaier’s claim for negligence per se premises liability. Dittmaier claims the trial court erred in its giving of two jury instructions.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. Judgment affirmed in accordance with 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.