Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Freeman v. State

Freeman v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 19, 2005 · Newton, P.J., Lowenstein and Breckenridge
178 S.W.3d 548; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063; 2005 WL 1670627 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Freeman v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Carl E. Freeman was found guilty of voluntary manslaugh *549 ter, Section 565.023, 1 and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Freeman now appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑