Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Coleman v. Hussmann Corp.

Coleman v. Hussmann Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 3, 2005 · Gaertner, Sullivan, Shaw
163 S.W.3d 515; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 677; 2005 WL 1018194 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Coleman v. Hussmann Corp.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hussmann Corporation (“Employer”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) finding Rick Coleman (“Employee”) sustained 40% permanent partial disability in each elbow. Employer claims the Commission erred in making independent findings that differed from the Administrative Law Judge’s findings.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcripts on appeal. The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the record. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the Commission’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.