Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

O'CONNELL v. State

O'CONNELL v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 24, 2005 · Breckenridge, P.J., Lowenstein and Hardwick
163 S.W.3d 37; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 781; 2005 WL 1213941 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

O'CONNELL v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin O’Connell appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value. AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.