Chitty v. State
Chitty v. State
174 S.W.3d 51; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559; 2005 WL 2739250
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Moore v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, David Paul Chitty, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.