Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Culpepper v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 25, 2005 · Hoff, Ahrens, Cohen

174 S.W.3d 77; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1562; 2005 WL 2746400 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Grizzle v. PENSKE LOGISTICS, INC. (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, John Culpepper, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to certain statements made by the prosecutor during closing argument.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.