ORDER

Chris Ritz appeals the denial after evi-dentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief raising nine points of error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in *516 formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).