Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Metz v. State

Metz v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 8, 2005 · Holliger, Lowenstein, Newton
154 S.W.3d 537; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 218; 2005 WL 294631 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Metz v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-Appellant Conrad Metz appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. This court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no reversible error, this court affirms the denial of the post-trial motion. Because a published opinion reciting the facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, this court affirms by summary order under Rule 84.16(b).

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.