Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Mazzie v. State

Mazzie v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 11, 2005 · Gaertner, Shaw, Sullivan
155 S.W.3d 775; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 38; 2005 WL 43125 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Mazzie v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Mazzie (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.0351 after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his plea was involuntary because he was under the mistaken impression he would be released át age seventy.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.