Cunningham v. State
Cunningham v. State
156 S.W.3d 453; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 258; 2005 WL 351344
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cunningham v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Dennis Cunningham appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his judgment and sentence following an evidentiary hearing.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.