Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Eacret v. State

Eacret v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 1, 2005 · Breckenridge, Hardwick, Lowenstein
156 S.W.3d 529; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 337; 2005 WL 465529 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Eacret v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Eacret appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. A published opinion would have no precedential value, but we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.