Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Stanford v. State

Stanford v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 8, 2005 · Breckenridge, Howard, Ulrich
156 S.W.3d 785; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 235; 2005 WL 287387 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Stanford v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason R. Stanford appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

*786The motion court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑