Meador v. State
Meador v. State
Opinion of the Court
Christopher Meador (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief (motion) after an evidentiary hearing. Movant pled guilty in Cause No. 02CR736360-01 to one count of second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.060
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.