State v. Robinson
State v. Robinson
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Keith Robinson (“defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of involuntary manslaughter. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting a number of exhibits and in admitting the testimony of Dr. Jane
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.