Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Patel v. State

Patel v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 22, 2005 · Ahrens, Baker, Norton
162 S.W.3d 108; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 637; 2005 WL 406055 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Patel v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Manu Patel (“movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *109error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑