Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Snelling v. State

Snelling v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 22, 2005 · Baker, Crandall, Crane
162 S.W.3d 126; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1573; 2005 WL 406118 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Snelling v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition with prejudice for failure to state a claim. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been *127furnished 'with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Plaintiffs motion to strike the legal file filed jointly by defendants Judge Robert H. Dierker, Judge Michael B. Calvin, and the State of Missouri, and plaintiffs motion to strike defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.’s motion to dismiss appeal and brief are denied.

Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.’s motion to dismiss the appeal and brief is denied as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.