Savage v. State
Savage v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Michael J. Savage (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rale references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.