Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

State v. Henry

State v. Henry
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 26, 2005 · Ahrens, Baker, Norton
165 S.W.3d 498; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 609; 2005 WL 947127 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Henry

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Emile Henry (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of two counts of robbery in the first degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing certain closing argument by the prosecutor, and in allowing evidence of defendant’s uncharged misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.