Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

In re of L.P.G.

In re of L.P.G.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 2, 2005 · Hoff, Mooney, Norton
168 S.W.3d 108; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119; 2005 WL 1803886 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

In re of L.P.G.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patrick M. Gately (Father) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and decree of adoption establishing Father’s biological son, L.P.G. (Son), as the child of Robert Paul Hendrickson and Karen Landers Hendrickson.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.