Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Matthews v. State

Matthews v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 11, 2005 · Gaertner, Shaw, Sullivan
168 S.W.3d 447; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 42; 2005 WL 43124 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Matthews v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Enron Matthews appeals from the trial court’s denial of his amended Rule 29.151 postconviction relief motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑