Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Blum v. Rambler

Blum v. Rambler
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 27, 2005 · Ellis, Holliger, Ulrich
172 S.W.3d 500; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1412; 2005 WL 2347816 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Blum v. Rambler

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joe and Mary Rambler appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of James Blum on his claims for declaratory judgment, partnership dissolution, and accounting. They contend that the trial court’s findings that farm real estate and other real estate and personal property were partnership property and were acquired by the partnership was contrary to the parties’ written partnership agreement and violated section 358.080. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.